Loading…
27
Old school welding vs. modern pulse machines - which setup ages better over 5 years?
I've been in the trade about 12 years now, and I keep going back and forth on this. When I started, my mentor swore by his old Lincoln tombstone and said all the new inverters were just gonna break in a few years. Fast forward to today, I own a miller pulse machine that I bought back in 2019, and it's still running strong with zero repairs. But I also see guys on job sites where their fancy multi-process units start acting up after 18 months, and they're stuck waiting for parts. On the flip side, I watched a buddy of mine burn through 3 used tombstone machines in 4 years because he kept hauling them in the rain without a cover. So what's the real story here? Has anyone else seen a big difference in reliability between the old iron and these new digital welders over a 5 year span? I'm trying to decide what to recommend to my apprentice.
3 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In3 Comments
gracethomas1mo ago
Have you looked at how much actual arc time each setup sees? I’ve seen old tombstone machines last decades on light duty, but the real money is in how a pulse machine handles a heavy daily schedule without burning up leads or wasting gas.
6
blair_chen811mo ago
Laughing at myself here because I bought a brand new pulse machine and spent the first week reading the manual like it was a novel. Old tombstone lets you be dumb and still get the job done, but those digital units force you to actually learn the settings. That said, my buddy's shop has a 20 year old Miller that still runs like a champ, so maybe I'm just lucky.
4