Loading…
10
Rant: I used a free font for a logo and it looked cheap compared to a paid one
I made a logo for a local cafe using a free font from a popular site, and it just looked flat and generic. I redid it with a $45 font from a foundry and the difference in character spacing and weight options was huge. Has anyone else had a project totally change after switching fonts?
4 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In4 Comments
henryt185mo ago
Yeah, and it's not just about the letters themselves... a lot of free fonts have really basic kerning, so you spend hours manually fixing the spacing between every single letter. That hidden time cost adds up fast. The paid font just worked right out of the box, which saved me a ton of frustration on a tight deadline. It feels like you're paying for the designer's attention to all those tiny details you don't notice until they're wrong.
6
noahgreen5mo ago
Totally feel that about the hidden time cost. I've been burned by bad kerning on free fonts right before a deadline too. It's like you think you're saving money but then you lose a whole afternoon fixing spacing. Paying for the font is basically buying back your own time and sanity. The good ones just work and let you focus on the actual design.
7
adamt845mo ago
That "paying for the designer's attention" part is so true. It's like getting a tool that's already been fine-tuned, so you can skip straight to making good stuff.
3
jenny_lee4mo ago
Exactly! It's like buying back your own time.
8