Debate: Do you prefer bench testing a whole box before install or wiring it in place?
I got into it with a guy at the shop last week. He swears by pulling every LRU and testing them on the bench before putting them in the aircraft. I usually wire stuff up in place and test as I go. His way takes more time upfront but maybe catches failures earlier. My way saves pulling connectors twice. Which side are you on and why? Any horror stories from either approach?
Jump right into pulling connectors twice, been there done that... Bench testing a whole box sounds good until you're the one tripping over a 50-pound LRU on a crowded workbench and wondering why you didn't just leave it in the plane. I tried the pull-and-test method once with an old generator controller... spent an hour chasing a bad solder joint on the bench, put it back in the aircraft, and the wiring harness itself had a short I missed. So yeah, I'll take testing in place any day, at least I know the whole system's alive and kicking when I'm done. Your buddy can keep his bench party, I'll stick to not creating extra work for no reason.
Creating extra work for no reason" is a bit dramatic don't you think? It's not like you're building a whole new plane from scratch, just checking a box on a bench or in the plane. Either way you're gonna end up tracing wires and pulling your hair out when something doesn't work right.
3 hours on a gen controller bench test and still missed a harness short? @mason_reed47 how do you even check for that kind of intermittent stuff without having the whole aircraft powered up?