Old school multimeter vs my new scope, am I crazy for going back?
So I've been torn on this for a few weeks now. I did a full avionics bench upgrade back in March, dropped $800 on a fancy digital scope with all the protocol decoding bells and whistles. It's great for tracing a flaky ARINC 429 bus on a 737 pack controller, saved me hours of poking around. But for simple stuff like checking a pitot heat element or verifying a relay coil's resistance, I keep reaching for my beat-up Fluke 87 from 2006. The scope is overkill, the menus lag, and sometimes I just want a dumb number I can trust. But my younger coworker says I'm stuck in the past, that the scope's waveform view catches intermittent stuff a meter will never see. I get that, but when a pilot calls from Phoenix complaining about a flickering display, I'm not dragging a scope up a ladder. Anyone else split their testing gear this way, or is it all-in on one platform for you guys?