The debate over detailed worldbuilding vs leaving gaps for readers
I've been on both sides of this for years. In my fantasy series I mapped out every city, language, and history down to the last detail, and readers loved the immersion. But then I wrote a short story where I left half the lore vague on purpose, and someone posted a 3-page theory about what it all meant that was way better than what I'd planned. Which approach actually makes for a better story, giving them the full blueprint or letting them fill in the blanks themselves? What's your take after writing something that went one way or the other?