Pro tip: Did maintenance intervals actually get worse over 15 years?
I started turning wrenches back in 2009 at a regional carrier, and back then we had these 100-hour checks that were pretty straightforward. You pulled the cowls, looked for leaks, greased the bearings, and sent it. Now I work at a major hub and these intervals feel way tighter. We're doing something every 50 hours on the same types of planes. Some guys say it's because the parts are more reliable now so we need to catch issues faster. But I think it's the opposite - the older stuff had more tolerance for abuse. I remember a Pratt 1000 series that went 500 hours hot section with no issues, just a borescope every so often. Now the manuals want a full teardown at 350. Is this actually making planes safer or is it just paperwork to cover liability? What have you guys seen over the years with interval creep?